postGame: West Virginia 93, Villanova 72

Posted by Chris on February 14, 2009
Big East Play
No Gravatar

If you missed the game check out the recap and box score, although I don’t blame you if you don’t want to.

All good things must come to end as the saying goes, but I don’t think anyone expected them to come to an end with a big kick to the groin. Villanova looked totally unfocused from the start en route to their worst beating of the season, a 21 point shellacking at the hands of Da’Sean Butler, who had a career high 43 points.

Hold on one second, Mike Patrick just let me know that was West Virginia’s biggest game of the season and they were playing like it.

Okay, back to the column. Look, we all knew Butler was their best player, and he was going to get his (although Pittsburgh held him to 4 last time out, which makes this even worse), but I could have never imagined him going for 30, much less 40. And the worst part? He wasn’t even going to play after injuring his ankle in practice.

Regardless, he was only one of the Wildcats’ problems. I was really concerned with the fact that Villanova had seemingly forgotten how to play defense the past 3 games. They seemed more intent on scoring than stopping their opponent, which is atypical of a Jay Wright-coached team. And low and behold when they run into a great defensive team and their shots aren’t falling, it was apparently obvious that they had forgotten how to grind out a game, letting the Mountaineers just run away from them.

It started early when Dante Cunningham picked up 2 silly offensive fouls in the first few minutes (by the way, Alex Ruoff is officially challenging Greg Paulus for biggest flopper in the NCAA), sending him to the bench for the rest of the half, but I thought he performed admirably even though he was a non-factor. Reggie Redding also played hard, he just wasn’t very good.

Antonio Pena and Scottie Reynolds looked like they had no interest in even being at the game. Pena was a main culprit of not boxing out giving up what seemed like 200 offensive rebounds (the official tally of 11 is way off). Reynolds had no idea what to do with a big defender on him, so his official strategy was barrel into the lane and hope to get bailed out by the refs.

If it isn’t for the play of Corey Fisher and Corey Stokes, Villanova would have lost by 50. It was that bad. 

But you know what? Whatever,this is actually a blessing in disguise in my mind. While it stinks to get embarrassed like that, the team needed this. They weren’t going to get by on just playing offense for the rest of the year. They needed a wake up call so they can re-commit to playing great D, which is what they originally built themselves on.

Rutgers comes to The Pavilion for Senior Night next Thursday, which should be a perfect remedy for last night. With the long layoff before the next game, the team is going to have a hardworking week I’d imagine, which is going to be good for them.

With the loss, Villanova pretty much took away any chance of a double-bye in the Big East Tournament, but that is okay. They need to refocus and come out and blast Rutgers next week. While this loss hurts now, in the grand scheme of this season it’s not a big deal.

Shake this one off ‘Nova Nation, West Virginia just had their backs to the wall and was nobody was beating them last night.

And why did the students rush the court? 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments to postGame: West Virginia 93, Villanova 72

login77
February 14, 2009

It’s a loss. Time to move on and get ready for the next game. The key is to learn from this game. Go Nova!

johnnyb1
February 14, 2009

wow, talk about a friday the 13th nightmare.. I realize West Virginia had their back against the wall last night, but a 21 pt. beatdown???

Seamus
February 14, 2009

My only problem with the game is how the heck do you let a guy go for 42 pts. I mean it was obvious that he was heating up. The worst part was that he kept getting open looks. I feel like Jay should have had at least one of his players just stick to him like glue. The repeated wide open looks were just killer. Seems to happen where one guy seems to go off and kill us. In the Seton Hall game Redding shut down their big scorer after he started hot. The lack of adjustment is just as big a kick in the groin as the blow out. I hope this is a wake up call to a team that was playing tremendously well and didn’t look anything like that team in this game.

Paul '91
February 14, 2009

I don’t think we lost a chance for the double-bye.

Marquette has:
@Georgetown
Conn
@Louisville
@Pitt
Syracuse

Pitt plays Conn twice, @Providence and the above mentioned

Louisville also has a couple tough games.

If we finish tied with Pitt, we get the nod. Not sure how Marquette would pan out. I’m not saying it’s a gimme, but if we finish out the season the way we are capable, a little luck could find us in the 4 spot.

Chris
February 15, 2009

Paul,

While UConn lost Dyson, there is no way I can see them dropping out of the Top 4. They should still roll pretty hard. 3 losses max at the end for them IMO.

Marquette now owns a very important tie breaker with their win over WV. They would have to lose at Pitt and another team (very possible I know) but that also assumes that Villanova wins out, which right now, I don’t see.

Pitt should cruise and Louisville’s schedule isn’t that hard so I just don’t see it.

Not that a double-bye is all that important but it would be nice.

Leave a comment

WP_Big_City